Exotic dancers who claim these were held against their will and photographed by The San Diego Area police officers in a compliance raid can move forward because of their lawsuit, a federal judge ruled in the week.
The 24 dancers, that have worked in the Cheetahs or Expose strip clubs, claim the officers violated their constitutional rights through the raids July 15, 2013, and March 6, 2014.
In line with the complaint, five to 15 law enforcement officers visited the clubs during the early-evening hours and ordered the san diego female strippers right into a dressing room, where these were told to hold back until called, the lawsuit said.
The officers then questioned the dancers, who have been scantily clad, checked their city-issued adult entertainer permits, asked about tattoos or piercings and photographed them.
The lawsuit claims a few of the officers “made arrogant and demeaning comments towards the entertainers and ordered them to expose areas of the body so that they could ostensibly photograph their tattoos.”
The dancers repeat the process lasted a lot more than an hour or so, and when several asked if they could leave, police threatened all of them with arrest and stationed officers in the exits, the suit says.
Lawyers for The San Diego Area police asked the judge to dismiss the lawsuit, saying the search and seizure was reasonable as presented by the city’s permitting law, which allows police inspections of adult entertainment businesses. Police have stated that cataloging tattoos is a simple way to identify dancers who regularly change their appearances.
“Submitting photographs and providing identification during reasonable inspections, to avoid losing a permit, is qualitatively better than stripping right down to undergarments, huddling within a dressing room for as much as an hour, and submitting to a photo shoot that involved the exposure of intimate areas of the body, to prevent arrest,” he wrote.
The judge is additionally allowing the lawsuit to look forward on a false-imprisonment claim plus a Monell claim, which could hold supervisors liable for the actions of lower-ranking officers if 70dexmpky might be proven the behavior was component of a long-standing custom or practice throughout the Police Department.
Although the judge agreed using the city that three raids within a year don’t figure to a “long-standing” or “widespread” practice, the judge also cited comments by a police spokesman who told the media that such raids were routine.